- Google should only try to make it expensive for Microsoft (start a bidding war and leave the curse of the winner befall Microsoft);
- Microsoft will finally have made the capital mistake--what will have been Microsoft's most significant loss/win? Mr. Ballmer himself.
- Yahoo! will lose the game (beginning with R&D talent);
- The financial community will stand to make great fees;
- The regulators will make a mistake to let it happen (see the next point);
- Per chance a deal goes through and a merger happens, the customers will be worse off for there are going to be fewer choices;
- The smaller players in Silicon Valley will lose an exit strategy (i.e. being acquired by Yahoo! or Microsoft);
Then, why is it that some take so much to learn? Let's say it's the competitive advantage of others.
Ideally, Yahoo! will be given more time, but time looks like the ultimate luxury. Something that after the decline of private equity players only a sovereign wealth fund can afford?
Ideally, Yahoo! will be given more time, but time looks like the ultimate luxury. Something that after the decline of private equity players only a sovereign wealth fund can afford?